Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2015; 21(19): 5995-6000
Published online May 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5995
Published online May 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5995
Table 2 Efficacy in the EZ-FIX and non-EZ-FIX groups
| EZ-FIX(n = 53) | Non-EZ-FIX(n = 52) | P value | |
| Total dose of midazolam | 2.42 ± 1.88 | 2.41 ± 1.91 | 0.976 |
| Total dose of propofol | 89.43 ± 49.8 | 112.4 ± 53.8 | 0.025 |
| Induction time, min | 3.37 ± 0.94 | 3.72 ± 1.02 | 0.067 |
| Recovery time, min | 11.23 ± 4.61 | 14.96 ± 5.12 | < 0.001 |
| Pt. satisfaction score | 7.26 ± 2.25 | 7.29 ± 2.47 | 0.722 |
| Dr. satisfaction score | 8.11 ± 0.99 | 6.54 ± 1.40 | < 0.001 |
| Nr. satisfaction score | 7.81 ± 1.03 | 6.02 ± 1.74 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Lee S, Han JH, Lee HS, Kim KB, Lee IK, Cha EJ, Shin YD, Park N, Park SM. Efficacy and safety of a patient-positioning device (EZ-FIX) for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(19): 5995-6000
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i19/5995.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5995