Transvaginal cholecystectomy vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder disease: A meta-analysis

doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5393

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 21, Issue 17

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (6819)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-12) series, Tables (1-2) series.

Item

Count

PDF

378

WORD

205

HTML

3942

Figures (1-12)

139

Tables (1-2)

146

Sum=4810

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

939

Download

1070

Sum=2009

May 7, 2015 (publication date) through May 12, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (18)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2015; 21(17): 5393-5406
Published online May 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5393

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 3 Meta-analysis for overall postoperative complications. Transvaginal cholecystectomy vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Citation: Xu B, Xu B, Zheng WY, Ge HY, Wang LW, Song ZS, He B. Transvaginal cholecystectomy vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder disease: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(17): 5393-5406
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i17/5393.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5393