Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2015; 21(16): 4903-4910
Published online Apr 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.4903
Published online Apr 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.4903
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the patients n (%)
| Overall | Conventional | UPD | P value | |
| Patients | 260 | 131 | 129 | - |
| Female | 90 (34.6) | 48 (36.6) | 42 (32.6) | 0.726 |
| Age (yr, mean ± SD) | 62.5 ± 4.8 | 62.5 ± 5.3 | 62.9 ± 6.5 | 0.455 |
| Abdominal surgery | 20 (7.7) | 9 (6.9) | 11 (8.5) | 0.334 |
| Examination by an expert colonoscopist | 166 (63.8) | 83 (63.4) | 83 (64.3) | 0.768 |
| Antispasmodics use | 239 (91.9) | 120 (91.6) | 119 (92.2) | 0.849 |
- Citation: Fukuzawa M, Uematsu J, Kono S, Suzuki S, Sato T, Yagi N, Tsuji Y, Yagi K, Kusano C, Gotoda T, Kawai T, Moriyasu F. Clinical impact of endoscopy position detecting unit (UPD-3) for a non-sedated colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(16): 4903-4910
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i16/4903.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.4903