Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2015; 21(15): 4722-4734
Published online Apr 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4722
Table 6 Consensus statement 4
In patients with main duct IPMN POPS may be used to assess the extent of tumor to assist surgical resection
Recommendation Grade C
Quality of evidence: 2+
Technical success: Technical success for POPS in patients with IPMN is reported between 73% and 92% when defined as ability to reach and examine the targeted lesion
Diagnostic accuracy: Diagnostic measures of POPS with or without POPS-guided biopsy for malignancy in IPMN are rarely reported in detail, and range from 50% to 68% sensitivity and from 87% to 100% specificity. Diagnostic accuracy seems better in main duct IPMN than in side branch IPMN
POPS findings in IPMN: The most commonly reported POPS findings associated with malignancy in IPMN are villous patterns and vascular images Granular mucosa and fish-like patterns without vascularity were not associated with malignancy
POPS and IDUS: Some studies document enhanced diagnostic accuracy when POPS is combined with endosonographic measures, particularly IDUS
Pre-operative and intra-operative POPS: The role of POPS to pre-operatively provide diagnostic information on malignancy and to pre-operatively and/or intra-operatively document the location and extent of dysplastic IPMN is generally reported