Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 14, 2015; 21(14): 4323-4333
Published online Apr 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i14.4323
Table 3 Bivariate estimates of diagnostic precision based on different carbohydrate antigen 19-9 assay methods and cut-off values
Assay method or cut-off valueNumber of studiesNumber of participantsSensitivity (95%CI)Specificity (95%CI)PLR (95%CI)NLR (95%CI)DOR (95%CI)
ELISA1113960.83 (0.80-0.86)0.79 (0.75-0.82)3.97 (2.96-5.33)0.20 (0.15-0.28)22.64 (12.44-41.22)
RIA1730740.82 (0.80-0.84)0.81 (0.79-0.83)4.16 (3.09-5.60)0.23 (0.19-0.27)20.14 (13.27-30.55)
EIA34270.75 (0.70-0.80)0.79 (0.70-0.86)3.84 (1.82-8.10)0.34 (0.27-0.43)10.29 (4.96-21.34)
LIA2224NDNDNDNDND
Cut-off of 37 U/mL3048790.82 (0.80-0.83)0.80 (0.78-0.82)3.94 (3.24-4.78)0.24 (0.21-0.28)18.79 (13.67-25.82)
Cut-off of 100 U/mL32970.69 (0.61-0.76)0.85 (0.79-0.91)4.35 (2.86-6.61)0.38 (0.18-0.77)11.53 (4.47-29.77)
All studies3451150.81 (0.80-0.83)0.81 (0.79-0.82)4.08 (3.39-4.91)0.24 (0.21-0.28)19.31 (14.40-25.90)