Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2015; 21(12): 3671-3678
Published online Mar 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3671
Published online Mar 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3671
Table 5 Tumor characteristics n (%)
| DR group(n = 29) | PR group(n = 30) | P value | ||
| Number of lesion | 36 | 32 | ||
| Histology | Adenoma | 19 (52.8) | 17 (53.1) | 0.995 |
| Carcinoma | 16 (44.4) | 14 (43.8) | ||
| Others | 1 (2.8) | 1 (3.1) | ||
| Macroscopic appearance | Elevated | 32 (88.9) | 27 (84.4) | 0.584 |
| Flat or depressed | 4 (11.1) | 5 (15.6) | ||
| Location | Upper body | 3 (8.3) | 3 (9.4) | 0.945 |
| Middle body | 8 (22.2) | 8 (25.0) | ||
| Lower body | 25 (69.4) | 21 (65.6) | ||
| Size (mm) | 15.7 ± 7.0 | 14.0 ± 6.7 | 0.344 |
- Citation: Kim N, Yoo YC, Lee SK, Kim H, Ju HM, Min KT. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sedation between dexmedetomidine-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil during endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(12): 3671-3678
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i12/3671.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3671