©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2015; 21(12): 3671-3678
Published online Mar 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3671
Published online Mar 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3671
Table 2 Modified aldrete scoring system
| Discharge criteria | Score |
| Activity: Able to move voluntarily or on command | |
| Four extremities | 2 |
| Two extremities | 1 |
| Zero extremities | 0 |
| Respiration | |
| Able to deep breathe and cough freely | 2 |
| Dyspnea, shallow or limited breathing | 1 |
| Apneic | 0 |
| Circulation | |
| Blood pressure ± 20 mmHg of preanesthetic level | 2 |
| Blood pressure ± 20 - 50 mmHg preanesthetic level | 1 |
| Blood pressure ± 50 mmHg of preanesthetic level | 0 |
| Consciousness | |
| Fully awake | 2 |
| Arousable on calling | 1 |
| Not responding | 0 |
| O2 saturation | |
| Able to maintain O2 saturation > 92% on room air | 2 |
| Needs O2 inhalation to maintain O2 saturation > 90% | 1 |
| O2 saturation < 90% even with O2 supplementation | 0 |
- Citation: Kim N, Yoo YC, Lee SK, Kim H, Ju HM, Min KT. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sedation between dexmedetomidine-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil during endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(12): 3671-3678
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i12/3671.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3671