Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 21, 2014; 20(7): 1871-1877
Published online Feb 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i7.1871
Table 2 Characteristics of papers included in the meta-analysis
StudyCountrynDiagnostic criteriaIBS typeAssessmentTimeAcupunctureControl treatment
Macpherson et al[19]United Kingdom233Rome criteriaIBSIBS symptom severity score12 wk (every 3 wk)Offer 10 weekly individualized acupuncture sessions plus usual careUsual care only
Forbes et al[17]United Kingdom59Rome I criteria and Manning criteriaIBSGlobal symptom score based on patient diary13 wkIndividualized 10 sessions over 10 wkSham acupuncture at non-acupoints
Sun et al[20]China63Rome IIIIBS-DSymptom score4 wkFixed formula; 20 sessions over 4 wkPinaverium bromide (50 mg tid)
Lembo et al[6]United States230Rome IIIBSIBS adequate relief3 wkFlexible formula; 10 sessions over 3 wkSham acupuncture at non-acupoints
Lowe et al[22]Canada50RomeIBSSymptom relief4 wkFixed formula; 8 sessions over 4 wkSham acupuncture - tapping blunt needle on the skin then tapping the needle in place
Anastasi et al[21]United States29Rome II or Rome IIIIBSClinical global impression scale4 wk (measured 3 wk)Flexible formula with moxibustion at all points; 8 sessions over 4 wkSham acupuncture - superficial needles 2-3 cm