Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 21, 2014; 20(7): 1858-1870
Published online Feb 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i7.1858
Table 2 Cohort studies included in the meta-analysis
StudyStudy locationAll subjectsCRC casesRR95%CIControl for potential confounding factors2
Clancy et al[50], 2013Italy26610924200.840.76-0.931-9
Leung et al[49], 2013Taiwan342056540.570.45-0.721-
Simon et al[51], 2012United States15921920000.990.83-1.201, 4, 10-27
Jacobs et al[53], 2011United States13325517391.030.94-1.141-
Lee et al[52], 2011United States13192216800.970.84-1.121, 6, 10, 12, 13, 28-34
Haukka et al[55], 2010Finland94496250161.040.98-1.101-
Matsushita et al[54], 2010Japan13724761.220.77-1.94-
Flick et al[57], 2009United States691151710.890.61-1.301, 4, 6, 10-13, 15, 18, 19, 28, 35-38
Singh et al[56], 2009Canada41327166371.131.02-1.251-4, 6, 7, 16, 39-42
Friedman et al[58], 2008United States424306756840.880.82-0.961-
Farwell et al[59], 2008United States628426870.650.55-0.781, 6, 11, 13, 19, 29, 43-53
Setoguchi et al[60], 2007United States317232490.960.70-1.311-9, 39, 43, 54-64
Friis et al[61], 2005Denmark33475430060.850.65-1.111, 2, 4, 16, 66