Anterior vs conventional approach hepatectomy for large liver cancer: A meta-analysis

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 20, Issue 45

Peer-Review Report of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2014; 20(45): 17235-17243
Published online Dec 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.17235

Table 1 Quality assessment of the included randomized controlled trials based on the Jadad scoring system

Ref.	Randomized	Appropriately randomized	Appropriately double blinded	Description of withdrawals	Jadad score	Study quality
Liu et al[7]	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	4	High
Capussotti et al[16]	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	4	High

Citation: Li L, Wang HQ, Wang Q, Yang J, Yang JY. Anterior vs conventional approach hepatectomy for large liver cancer: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(45): 17235-17243
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i45/17235.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.17235

Li L, Wang HQ, Wang Q, Yang J, Yang JY. Anterior vs conventional approach hepatectomy for large liver cancer: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(45): 17235-17243 [PMID: 25493040 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.17235]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.