Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2014; 20(43): 16334-16342
Published online Nov 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i43.16334
Table 1 Characteristics of included studies
StudyCountryDesignMaleAge (yr)No. of participantsSensitivitySpecificityTPFPFNTNQUADAS
(%)score
Pengjun et al[11], 2013ChinaCase-control52.431-74149 CRC, 93 colorectal adenoma, 69 controls0.8690.9711492236912
(mean 58.0)
Kantola et al[18], 2012FinlandCase-control51.0Mean 67.9148 CRC, 86 controls0.8090.82111518278412
Bünger et al[10], 2012GermanyCase-control52.340.5-99.1164 CRC, 34 colorectal adenomas, 119 controls0.2200.9008162875212
(mean 69.6)
Bünger et al[19], 2011GermanyCase-control52.038-8850 CRC, 50 controls0.2800.9405031295012
(mean 71.2)
Kaminska et al[20], 2005PolandCase-control49.032-82157 CRC, 50 controls0.8830.58015736215011
Current studyChinaCase-control52.1Mean 55.448 CRC, 37 controls0.8540.541411772012