©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2014; 20(39): 14488-14494
Published online Oct 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14488
Published online Oct 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14488
Table 2 Comparison of technical performance of colonoscopy, quality of bowel preparation and patient tolerability between groups
| Technical performance | Whole-dose same-morning | Split-dose | P |
| n = 152 | n = 143 | ||
| Completed colonoscopy | 98.7% | 98.6% | 1.000 |
| Cecal intubation time, s | 600 (432-900) | 657 (480-980) | 0.510 |
| Withdrawal time, s | 298 (180-418) | 244 (180-348) | 0.235 |
| Total colonoscopy time, s | 960 (660-1320) | 960 (720-1304) | 0.888 |
| Adenoma detection rate | 31.6% | 30.1% | 0.779 |
| Number of adenoma detected | 1 (1-2) | 2 (1-3) | 0.010 |
| Boston bowel preparation scale | |||
| Right | 2 (2-2) | 2 (2-3) | 0.060 |
| Transverse | 2 (2-3) | 2 (2-3) | 0.119 |
| Left | 2 (2-3) | 2 (2-3) | 0.176 |
| Total | 6 (6-7) | 6 (6-8) | 0.038 |
| Overall grading of quality of bowel preparation | |||
| Good or intermediate | 92.1% | 97.2% | 0.071 |
| Poor | 7.9% | 2.8% | |
| Completed bowel preparation | 94.1% | 99.3% | 0.020 |
| Difficult to complete bowel preparation | 61.2% | 29.4% | < 0.001 |
| Will try another preparation | 78.9% | 53.8% | < 0.001 |
| Refuse the same preparation | 13.8% | 6.3% | 0.033 |
| Barely tolerable or unacceptable taste | 7.9% | 5.6% | 0.432 |
| Nausea | 37.5% | 25.2% | 0.023 |
| Vomiting | 16.4% | 8.4% | 0.037 |
| Abdominal pain | 19.7% | 13.3% | 0.137 |
| Bloating | 32.2% | 30.1% | 0.688 |
| Chest pain | 3.9% | 5.6% | 0.506 |
| Dizziness | 10.5% | 9.8% | 0.834 |
| Level of comfort during bowel preparation | |||
| Unfavourable response | 28.3% | 18.9% | 0.058 |
| Favourable response | 71.7% | 81.1% |
- Citation: Chan WK, Azmi N, Mahadeva S, Goh KL. Split-dose vs same-day reduced-volume polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution for morning colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(39): 14488-14494
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i39/14488.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14488