Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2014; 20(30): 10223-10237
Published online Aug 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i30.10223
Table 4 Result of randomized controlled trials: Adjuvant/neoadjuvant treatment in resected hepatocellular cancer
Ref.TreatmentRecurrence rate-3 yr
Izumi et al[57] 1994Adjuvant arterial lipiodolization (23) vs control (27)No differences
Lai et al[58] 1998Adjuvant chemoembolization (30) vs control (36)82% vs 52%, P = NS
Yamasaki et al[59] 1996Neoadjuvant chemoembolization (50) vs control (47)54% vs 66%, P = NS
Lau et al[60] 1999Adjuvant intraarterial lipiodol 131I (21) vs control (22)75% vs 38%, P = 0.03
Lygidakis et al[61] 1996Adjuvant chemoembolization + immunotherapy (49) vs control (42)36 mo vs 18 mo (OS)
Takayama et al[62] 2000Adjuvant immunotherapy (76) vs control (74)33% vs 48%, P = 0.008
Yamamoto et al[63] 1996Adjuvant 5-FU (35) vs control (32)52% vs 75%, P = NS
Kubo et al[64] 2001Adjuvant Interferon alpha (15) vs control (15)30% vs 60%, P= 0.03