Non-surgical treatment of post-surgical bile duct injury: Clinical implications and outcomes

Table 6 Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with bile duct injury type 3

Sex/age	Result	Operation	Time to diagnosis (d)	Number of procedures			Treatment duration (d)	Leak location	Stricture location
				ERC	PTC	PCD
F/37	Success	Cholecystectomy	10	2	7	2	180	Multiple	Anastomosis
M/40	Failure	Cholecystectomy	5	1	1	0	5	IHD	IHD/
F/26	Success	Cholecystectomy	59	2	0	1	94	CBD/CHD	CBD/CHD
M/22	Failure	Cholecystectomy	21	0	3	0	69	CBD/CHD	CBD/CHD
F/50	Failure	Cholecystectomy	5	1	2	0	13	Duct stump	IHD
M/45	Failure	Cholecystectomy	0	1	0	0	45	CBD/CHD	CBD/CHD
M/25	Failure	Cholecystectomy	13	1	1	0	7	CBD/CHD	CBD/CHD
M/45	Failure	Rt. hepatectomy	12	0	1	1	45	IHD	IHD
F/65	Success	Cholecystectomy	60	5	0	0	364	CBD/CHD	CBD/CHD
M/81	Failure	Cholecystectomy	8	1	5	4	482	Duct stump	IHD

IHD: Intrahepatic duct; CBD: Common bile duct; CHD: Common hepatic duct; ERC: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography; PTC: Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography; PCD: Percutaneous drainage; M: Male; F: Female.