Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of common bile duct stones: A meta-analysis

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 20, Issue 18

Peer-Review Report of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2014; 20(18): 5548-5556
Published online May 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5548

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Flow diagram of study selection.

Citation: Jin PP, Cheng JF, Liu D, Mei M, Xu ZQ, Sun LM. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of common bile duct stones: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(18): 5548-5556
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i18/5548.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5548

Jin PP, Cheng JF, Liu D, Mei M, Xu ZQ, Sun LM. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of common bile duct stones: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(18): 5548-5556 [PMID: 24833886 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5548]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.