Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of common bile duct stones: A meta-analysis

doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5548

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 20, Issue 18

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (7205)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series, Tables (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

568

WORD

199

HTML

4597

Figures (1-2)

136

Tables (1-4)

121

Sum=5621

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

842

Download

742

Sum=1584

May 14, 2014 (publication date) through Apr 22, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (41)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2014; 20(18): 5548-5556
Published online May 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5548

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Flow diagram of study selection.

Citation: Jin PP, Cheng JF, Liu D, Mei M, Xu ZQ, Sun LM. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of common bile duct stones: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(18): 5548-5556
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i18/5548.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5548