Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2014; 20(17): 5119-5123
Published online May 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.5119
Table 2 Results of the randomized controlled trials with intention-to-treat analysis
Ref.Regimen4-wk healing rateRate of adverse effects
Ho et al[17], 2009I 10 mg/d78.6% (77/98)23.5% (23/98)
O 20 mg/d78.8% (82/104)22.1% (23/104)
Zhou et al[19],2009I 10 mg/d90.3% (307/340)8.2% (28/340)
O 20 mg/d87.6% (149/170)11.2% (19/170)
Song et al[18], 2010I 10 mg/d85.9% (67/78)6.4% (5/78)
E 40 mg/d87.2% (68/78)7.5% (6/78)
Wang et al[23], 2011I 10 mg/d93.1% (54/58)6.9% (4/58)
O 20 mg/d89.8% (53/59)13.6% (8/59)
Wang et al[24], 2012I 10 mg/d95.0% (307/331)8.5% (28/331)
O 20 mg/d90.0% (149/165)11.6% (19/165)