©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2014; 20(17): 5119-5123
Published online May 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.5119
Published online May 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.5119
Table 2 Results of the randomized controlled trials with intention-to-treat analysis
| Ref. | Regimen | 4-wk healing rate | Rate of adverse effects |
| Ho et al[17], 2009 | I 10 mg/d | 78.6% (77/98) | 23.5% (23/98) |
| O 20 mg/d | 78.8% (82/104) | 22.1% (23/104) | |
| Zhou et al[19],2009 | I 10 mg/d | 90.3% (307/340) | 8.2% (28/340) |
| O 20 mg/d | 87.6% (149/170) | 11.2% (19/170) | |
| Song et al[18], 2010 | I 10 mg/d | 85.9% (67/78) | 6.4% (5/78) |
| E 40 mg/d | 87.2% (68/78) | 7.5% (6/78) | |
| Wang et al[23], 2011 | I 10 mg/d | 93.1% (54/58) | 6.9% (4/58) |
| O 20 mg/d | 89.8% (53/59) | 13.6% (8/59) | |
| Wang et al[24], 2012 | I 10 mg/d | 95.0% (307/331) | 8.5% (28/331) |
| O 20 mg/d | 90.0% (149/165) | 11.6% (19/165) |
- Citation: Ji XQ, Du JF, Chen G, Chen G, Yu B. Efficacy of ilaprazole in the treatment of duodenal ulcers: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(17): 5119-5123
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i17/5119.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.5119