Clinical study on external counterpulsation in treatment of viral hepatitis

Table 3 Effective rate comparison among group

	ECP Group									Control Group
	N	Notably		Effective		Improved		Ineffective		N	Notably		Effective		Improved		Ineffective
		n	%	n	%	n	%	n	%		n	%	n	%	n	%	n	%
IHA	300	182	58.8	96	31.1	25	8.1	6	1.9	205	30	14.6	73	35.7	65	31.7	37	18.0
IHB	270	129	47.8	103	38.1	23	8.5	15	5.6	137	24	12.8	75	40.1	57	30.5	31	16.6
NIHA	96	51	52.6	34	35.1	8	8.2	4	4.1	102	26	25.5	32	31.4	31	30.1	13	12.7
NIHB	98	37	37.8	39	39.8	12	12.2	10	10.2	104	25	24.0	35	33.7	28	26.9	16	15.4
CPH	190	76	40.0	70	36.8	36	18.9	8	4.3	147	36	24.5	43	29.3	49	33.3	19	12.9
CAH	40	4	10.0	19	47.5	10	25.0	7	17.5	38	6	15.8	8	21.1	15	39.5	9	26.7
TPTAL	1004	479	47.7	361	35.9	14	11.4	5	5.1	783	147	18.8	266	34.0	245	31.3	125	16.0

^bP < 0.01 vs control group. I: Ictero; NI: No ictero; ECP: External counterpulsation.