Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2013; 19(42): 7461-7471
Published online Nov 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i42.7461
Table 2 Overall survival and treatment-related toxicity of the eligible trials included in the meta-analysis
Ref.Treatment armsParticipantsOverall survival (n)
3-4 grade treatment-related toxicity (n)
6 mo12 mo18 moHematologicalNon-hematological
Loehrer et al[9]RT 50.4 Gy + GEM vs GEM372812429
3426171026
Klaassen et al[10]RT 40 Gy + 5FU vs 5FU442514118NR
47281251
Moertel et al[11]RT 35-40 Gy + saline vs RT 35-40 Gy + 5FU3215301213
3220612424
GITSG et al[12]RT 60 Gy vs RT 60 Gy + 5FU vs RT 40 Gy + 5FU281020
3225113NRNR
2919114
Cohen et al[13]RT 59.4 Gy vs RT 59.4 Gy + 5FU + MMC4928102513
55361751317
Chauffert et al[6]RT 60 Gy + 5FU + DDP + GEM vs GEM594720112912
604933211211
Moertel et al[14]RT 60 Gy vs RT 60 Gy + 5FU vs RT 40 Gy + 5FU25136440
867452345322
836349403918
Sun et al[15]RT 45-50 Gy + GEM vs GEM251812NR55
2915754
Sun et al[16]RT 50-60 Gy + GEM vs GEM + DDP262116NR36
301811310
Wu et al[17]RT 48-56 Gy vs RT 48-60 Gy + GEM + DDP31NR9NRNRNR
337
Wu et al[18]RT 60 Gy vs RT 50 Gy + GEM34NR5NR0NR
36112
Ding et al[19]RT 45-50 Gy + 5FU + GEM vs 5FU + GEM251812NR55
2915754
Childs et al[20]RT 35-40 Gy + saline vs RT 35-40 Gy + 5FU1241NR25
136289
GITSG et al[21]RT 54 Gy + 5FU + SMF vs SMF221994143
21174033
Hazel et al[22]RT 46 Gy + 5FU vs 5FU + CCNU15NRNR2NRNR
151