BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Brief Article
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2013; 19(41): 7168-7176
Published online Nov 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i41.7168
Table 4 Comparison of complications between the two groups n (%)
PAD (n = 93)
Non-PAD (n = 130)
P value1
EPLBD + ES (n = 59)EPLBD - ES (n = 34)P valueEPLBD + ES (n = 73)EPLBD - ES (n = 57)P value
Pancreatitis2 (3.4)5 (14.7)0.0957 (9.6)5 (8.8)0.8730.809
Perforation0 (0.0)0 (0.0)NA0 (0.0)1 (1.8)0.4381.000
Bleeding2 (3.4)3 (8.8)0.3517 (9.6)4 (7.0)0.6010.548
Major0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (1.4)0 (0.0)
Minor2 (13.4)3 (8.8)6 (8.2)4 (7.0)
Hyperamylasemia4 (6.8)5 (14.7)0.27915 (20.5)6 (10.5)0.1230.232
Mortality0 (0.0)0 (0.0)NA1 (1.4)1 (1.8)1.0000.230


Write to the Help Desk