©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2013; 19(17): 2704-2708
Published online May 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i17.2704
Published online May 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i17.2704
Table 3 Complications
| Group A (medical adhesive group) | Group B(control group) | P value | |
| Incidence of delayed bleeding | 0.00% | 4.88% | 0.035 |
| Incidence of perforation | 10.10% | 9.80% | 0.938 |
| Location of perforation (n) | |||
| Esophageal | 1 | 2 | |
| Gastric | 7 | 6 | |
| Colorectal | 1 | 0 | |
| Perforated lesions | |||
| Muscularis propria | 7 | 8 | |
| Scar formation | 1 | 0 | |
| Non-scar forming lesion | 1 | 0 | |
| Incidence of abdominal distension | 13.50% | 12.20% | 0.802 |
| With perforation | 8 | 6 | |
| Without perforation | 4 | 4 | |
| Difficulty excreting adhesive | 2.25% | 0.00% |
- Citation: Zhang Y, Chen Y, Qu CY, Zhou M, Ni QW, Xu LM. Effects of medical adhesives in prevention of complications after endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(17): 2704-2708
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i17/2704.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i17.2704