Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 14, 2013; 19(14): 2227-2233
Published online Apr 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i14.2227
Published online Apr 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i14.2227
Ref. | Pts. No. | PS type | Start of cut | All complications | PEP | Bleeding | Perforation |
Slot et al[1] | - | PNK | Orifice | 12% | 0.5% | 5.5% | 3% |
Kasmin et al[14] | 72/398 | PNK | Centre | 11% | 3.8% | 3.8% | 3.8% |
Huibregtse et al[21] | 190/987 | PNK | Orifice | 2.6% | 1.0% | 1.5% | 0% |
Dowsett et al[25] | 96/748 | PNK | Orifice | 5.20% | 1.0% | 4% | 0% |
Shakoor et al[26] | 53/1367 | PNK | Orifice | 11% | 5.5% | 3.7% | 1.8% |
Leung et al[27] | 20/510 | PNK | Centre | 20% | 0% | 20% | 0% |
Donnellan et al[28] | 352/2603 | PNK | Centre | 4.8% | 1.0% | 4.2% | 0.3% |
Our data | 84/402 | PNK | Centre | 4.80% | 5.4% | 0% | 0% |
59/402 | PCS | - | 3.4% | 3.4% | 0% | 0% | |
Binmoeller et al[11] | 123/327 | PCS | - | 5.3% | 2.7% | 2.4% | 0% |
Goff et al[12] | 32/110 | PCS | - | 12% | 12% | 0% | 0% |
- Citation: Jamry A. Comparative analysis of endoscopic precut conventional and needle knife sphincterotomy. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(14): 2227-2233
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i14/2227.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i14.2227