©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2012; 18(39): 5560-5569
Published online Oct 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i39.5560
Published online Oct 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i39.5560
Table 3 Performance comparison between automated probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy classification and off-line expert diagnosis of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy, for the differentiation between neoplastic and non-neoplastic colonic polyps
| Automated pCLE classification | Off-line expert diagnosis of pCLE | |
| Accuracy | ||
| % | 89.6 | 89.6 |
| Fraction | 121/135 | 121/135 |
| Sensitivity | ||
| % | 92.5 | 91.4 |
| Fraction | 86/93 | 85/93 |
| Specificity | ||
| % | 83.3 | 85.7 |
| Fraction | 35/42 | 36/42 |
| Statistical significance between (1) and (2) | ||
| McNemar’s test, alpha = 0.05 | ||
| Accuracy: (P, power) | (Not significant, 2.5%) | |
| Sensitivity: (P, power) | (Not significant, 6.5%) | |
| Specificity: (P, power) | (Not significant, 5.2%) | |
| Statistical equivalence between (1) and (2) | ||
| Two-sided Z test | ||
| 95% CI for accuracy | -0.073-0.073 | |
| 95% CI for sensitivity | -0.068-0.089 | |
| 95% CI for specificity | -0.18-0.13 | |
- Citation: André B, Vercauteren T, Buchner AM, Krishna M, Ayache N, Wallace MB. Software for automated classification of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy videos of colorectal polyps. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(39): 5560-5569
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i39/5560.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i39.5560