©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2012; 18(37): 5289-5294
Published online Oct 7, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i37.5289
Published online Oct 7, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i37.5289
Table 3 Postoperative recovery of the two groups
| Minilaparotomy group | Traditional laparotomy group | P value | |
| Recovery | |||
| Aerofluxus (d) | 3.5 ± 1.1 | 4.3 ± 1.8 | 0.000 |
| Oral feeding (d) | 4.1 ± 1.2 | 4.6 ± 1.2 | 0.628 |
| Defecation (d) | 5.0 ± 1.4 | 5.4 ± 1.5 | 0.370 |
| Ambulation (d) | 3.2 ± 0.8 | 3.9 ± 2.3 | 0.000 |
| Hospital stay (d) | 6.4 ± 1.5 | 9.7 ± 2.2 | 0.000 |
| POSSUM scores (%) | |||
| Predictive mortality | 28.1 | 26.8 | 0.738 |
| Predictive morbidity | 5.3 | 5.0 | 0.844 |
| Complications | |||
| Gastric retention | 8 (2.0) | 18 (1.8) | 0.494 |
| Incision infection | 6 (1.5) | 15 (1.5) | 0.592 |
| Pulmonary infection | 5 (1.2) | 14 (1.4) | 0.513 |
| Anastomosis leakage | 2 (0.5) | 48 (4.8) | 0.000 |
| Intestinal obstruction | 9 (2.2) | 73 (7.3) | 0.000 |
| Other | 13 (3.2) | 35 (3.5) | 0.456 |
- Citation: Wang XD, Huang MJ, Yang CH, Li K, Li L. Minilaparotomy to rectal cancer has higher overall survival rate and earlier short-term recovery. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(37): 5289-5294
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i37/5289.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i37.5289