©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2012; 18(27): 3551-3557
Published online Jul 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3551
Published online Jul 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3551
Table 5 Comparison between national United States study and the current audit
| % | Current audit (%) | |
| Patient characteristics | ||
| Women | 49 | 42.8, 95% CI: 36.6-49.0 |
| Men | 51 | 57.2, 95% CI: 51.0-63.4 |
| Average risk | 29.6 | 38.5, 95% CI: 32.0-44.9 |
| Past family history | 13.4 | 20.2, 95% CI: 14.7-25.7 |
| Past personal history | 19 | 43.3, 95% CI: 36.5-50.1 |
| Presence of recorded variables | ||
| ASA classification | 89.9 | 0 |
| Bowel preparation quality | 86.1 | 99.6, 95% CI: 98.8-100.0 |
| Previous GI colonoscopy date | 33.9 | 14.0, 95% CI: 8.7-19.2 |
| Cecal landmarks | 85.9 | 67.2, 95% CI: 61.3-73.1 |
| Polyp size | 90 | 65.8, 95% CI: 56.8-74.7 |
| Polyp morphology | 85.3 | 62.2, 95% CI: 53.0-71.3 |
| Polyp retrieval | 95.5 | 84.7, 95% CI: 76.9-92.5 |
| Endoscopic outcomes | ||
| Cecal intubation | 96.3 | 94.4, 95% CI: 91.5-97.3 |
| Polyp findings | 36.3 | 44.4, 95% CI: 38.2-50.6 |
- Citation: Beaulieu D, Barkun A, Martel M. Quality audit of colonoscopy reports amongst patients screened or surveilled for colorectal neoplasia. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(27): 3551-3557
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i27/3551.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3551