Brief Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2012; 18(26): 3400-3408
Published online Jul 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i26.3400
Table 2 Adenoma miss rates1 by indication for procedure
IndicationGroup A standard colonoscopy firstGroup B Third Eye colonoscopy firstRelative risk2 (95% CI)P
All Indications349/173 = 0.28326/176 = 0.1481.92 (1.25-2.94)0.029
Screening19/91 = 0.20916/85 = 0.1881.11 (0.62-2.04)0.815
Surveillance20/36 = 0.5569/51 = 0.1763.15 (1.63-6.10)0.014
Diagnostic10/44 = 0.2271/38 = 0.0268.64 (1.16-64.41)0.039
Surveillance + diagnostic30/80 = 0.37510/89 = 0.1123.34 (1.74-6.39)0.003

  • Citation: Siersema PD, Rastogi A, Leufkens AM, Akerman PA, Azzouzi K, Rothstein RI, Vleggaar FP, Repici A, Rando G, Okolo PI, Dewit O, Ignjatovic A, Odstrcil E, East J, Deprez PH, Saunders BP, Kalloo AN, Creel B, Singh V, Lennon AM, DeMarco DC. Retrograde-viewing device improves adenoma detection rate in colonoscopies for surveillance and diagnostic workup. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(26): 3400-3408
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i26/3400.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i26.3400