©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2012; 18(19): 2357-2363
Published online May 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i19.2357
Published online May 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i19.2357
Table 3 Univariate analysis of variables potentially associated with an endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration sensitivity > 80% for the diagnosis of solid mass lesions
| Pvalue | |
| Number of needle passes based on ROSE or > 7 (small pancreatic lesions) | < 0.0001 |
| Number of needle passes based on ROSE or > 7 (large pancreatic lesions) | 0.0002 |
| ROSE available | 0.0017 |
| Number of needle passes based on ROSE or > 7 (lymphadenopathy) | 0.0019 |
| High annual hospital caseload | 0.0242 |
| Routine isolation of microcores | 0.0422 |
| Method of sample preservation | 0.1198 |
| Years of EUS practice | 0.6475 |
- Citation: Dumonceau JM, Koessler T, van Hooft JE, Fockens P. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration: Relatively low sensitivity in the endosonographer population. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(19): 2357-2363
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i19/2357.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i19.2357