Impact of changing our cannulation method on the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis after pancreatic guidewire placement

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 17, Issue 48

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

396

HTML

2825

Figures (1-2)

226

Tables (1-4)

157

Sum=3604

Dec 28, 2011 (publication date) through Apr 30, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2011; 17(48): 5289-5294
Published online Dec 28, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i48.5289

Table 2 Outcome of pancreatic guidewire placement n (%)

	Total (n = 142)	Cannulation method
		CI using a single-lumen catheter (n = 104)	WGC using a double-lumen catheter (n = 38)	P value
Successful biliary cannulation	98 (69)	69 (66)	29 (76)	0.35
Post-ERCP pancreatitis	22 (16)	21 (20)	1 (2.6)	0.012

ERCP: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; CI: Contrast injection; WGC: Wire-guided cannulation.

Citation: Hisa T, Matsumoto R, Takamatsu M, Furutake M. Impact of changing our cannulation method on the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis after pancreatic guidewire placement. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(48): 5289-5294
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i48/5289.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i48.5289