Comparative outcome of stapled trans-anal rectal resection and macrogol in the treatment of defecation disorders

doi:10.3748/wjg.v17.i37.4199

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 17, Issue 37

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (3474)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-1) series, Tables (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

383

HTML

2799

Figures (1-1)

152

Tables (1-4)

140

Sum=3474

Oct 7, 2011 (publication date) through Apr 23, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (9)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2011; 17(37): 4199-4205
Published online Oct 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i37.4199

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Percentage of patients with constipation symptoms, rectal bleeding, and use of laxatives (other than macrogol in the macrogol treatment group) after stapled trans-anal rectal resection and during macrogol treatment. No statistical difference was observed between the two study groups. STARR: Stapled trans-anal rectal resection. ev: Evacuations.

Citation: Biviano I, Badiali D, Candeloro L, Habib FI, Mongardini M, Caviglia A, Anzini F, Corazziari ES. Comparative outcome of stapled trans-anal rectal resection and macrogol in the treatment of defecation disorders. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(37): 4199-4205
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i37/4199.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i37.4199