Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2011; 17(37): 4199-4205
Published online Oct 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i37.4199
Published online Oct 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i37.4199
Table 4 Defecographic findings in responders and non-responders submitted to stapled trans-anal rectal resection (mean ± SD)
| Variables | Before | After | ||
| Non-responders | Responders | Non-responders | Responders | |
| Rectal diameter (cm) | 7.7 ± 1.4 | 7.3 ± 1 | 5.5 ± 0.9 | 5.8 ± 1.5 |
| ∆ ARA evacuation (°) | 16 ± 8 | 25 ± 18 | 8.1 ± 20.3 | 28 ± 16.2a |
| PF at rest (cm) | 5.1 ± 1.5 | 4.8 ± 1.3 | 4.3 ± 1.5 | 4.6 ± 1 |
| PF during sqeezing (cm) | 1.4 ± 0.7 | 1.3 ± 0.9 | 1.8 ± 0.9 | 1.2 ± 0.8 |
| ∆ PF evacuation (cm) | 3.1 ± 1.6 | 3 ± 1.3 | 3.6 ± 1.1 | 3.1 ± 1.5 |
| Rectocele (cm) | 3.8 ± 1.8 | 4.1 ± 0.6 | 1.1 ± 1.6 | 1.7 ± 1.5 |
| Anal diameter (cm) | 1.4 ± 0.6 | 1.4 ± 0.8 | 1.3 ± 0.8 | 1.1 ± 0.4 |
- Citation: Biviano I, Badiali D, Candeloro L, Habib FI, Mongardini M, Caviglia A, Anzini F, Corazziari ES. Comparative outcome of stapled trans-anal rectal resection and macrogol in the treatment of defecation disorders. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(37): 4199-4205
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i37/4199.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i37.4199