Brief Article
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2011; 17(17): 2216-2222
Published online May 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i17.2216
Table 1 Comparative data for the prevalence of the demographic, laboratory and sonographic findings between the non-neoplastic polyp group and the neoplastic polyp group (mean ± SD) n (%)
Total (n = 210)Non-neoplastic (n = 146)Neoplastic (n = 64)P
Age (yr)51.8 ± 13.749.1 ± 12.357.9 ± 14.7< 0.001
Age > 65 yr49 (23.3)22 (15.1)27 (42.2)< 0.001
Gender, male109 (51.9)77 (52.7)32 (50.0)  0.785
BMI (kg/m2)24.0 ± 2.9723.9 ± 3.0124.1 ± 2.89  0.620
Obesity79 (38.2)53 (36.6)26 (41.9)  0.465
Hypertension34 (16.3)20 (13.7)14 (22.2)  0.126
Diabetes mellitus46 (21.9)21 (13.0)27 (42.1)< 0.001
Hypercholesterolemia77 (36.7)57 (39.0)20 (31.3)  0.135
RUQ pain37 (17.6)24 (16.4)13 (20.3)  0.498
Total bilirubin (g/dL)1.22 ± 3.410.91 ± 0.411.93 ± 6.17  0.189
ALP (g/dL)69.4 ± 60.962.5 ± 20.284.7 ± 104.7  0.097
AST (IU/dL)33.2 ± 61.926.2 ± 21.449.2 ± 105.9  0.090
ALT (IU/dL)34.5 ± 42.029.1 ± 23.347.0 ± 66.2  0.041
Size ( mm)16.1 ± 8.2013.5 ± 4.522.1 ± 11.1< 0.001
Size > 15 mm78 (37.1)33 (22.3)45 (70.3)< 0.001
Location  0.977
Fundus156 (74.3)109 (74.7)47 (73.4)
Body44 (21.0)30 (20.5)14 (21.9)
Neck10 (4.8)7 (4.8)3 (4.7)
No. of polyps  0.002
Multiple76 (36.2)63 (43.2)13 (20.3)
Solitary134 (63.8)83 (56.8)51 (79.7)
Hyperechoic spots  0.315
No172 (81.9)117 (80.1)55 (85.9)
Yes38 (18.1)29 (19.9)9 (14.1)
Echogenecity  0.125
Anechoic or hyperechoic130 (61.9)96 (65.8)34 (53.1)
Hypoechoic or isoechoic80 (38.1)50 (34.2)30 (46.9)
Echo pattern  0.093
Homogeneous115 (52.9)85 (58.2)30 (46.9)
Inhomogeneous95 (45.2)60 (41.1)35 (54.7)
Sonographic surface pattern< 0.001
Smooth surface174 (82.9)131 (89.7)43 (67.2)
Nodular surface36 (17.1)15 (10.3)21 (32.8)