Surgical vs percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma in dangerous locations

doi:10.3748/wjg.v17.i1.123

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 17, Issue 1

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (3448)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-1) series, Tables (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

385

HTML

2786

Figures (1-1)

153

Tables (1-4)

124

Sum=3448

Jan 7, 2011 (publication date) through Apr 20, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (12)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2011; 17(1): 123-129
Published online Jan 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i1.123

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Local tumor progression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma at common and dangerous locations (A), and hepatocellular carcinoma (B), cirrhosis (C), solitary hepatocellular carcinoma with its diameter ≥ 3 cm (D) after percutaneous and surgical radiofrequency ablation.

Citation: Huang JW, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Croome KP, Yan LN, Wu H, Chen ZY, Prasoon P, Zeng Y. Surgical vs percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma in dangerous locations. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(1): 123-129
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i1/123.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i1.123