©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2011; 17(1): 53-62
Published online Jan 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i1.53
Published online Jan 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i1.53
Table 2 Summary of performance of emerging optical technologies
| Type of detection | Study size | Sensitivity, specificity |
| AFI | 60 patients, 116 images | 91%, 43%[36] |
| NBI | 63 patients, 175 images | 94%, 76%[33] |
| 51 patients, 204 images | 100%, 98%[34] | |
| 21 patients, 75 images | 89%, 95%[38] | |
| High-resolution imaging (1-15 μm resolution) | ||
| OCT | 33 patients, 314 images | 68%, 82%[43] |
| 55 patients, 177 images | 83%, 75%[58] | |
| Endocytoscopy | 16 patients, 166 images | 56%, 68% (425 ×) |
| 42%, 83% (1125 ×)[47] | ||
| Confocal imaging | 63 patients, 433 images | 93%, 98%[48] |
| 38 patients, 296 images | 75%, 90%[50] |
- Citation: Thekkek N, Anandasabapathy S, Richards-Kortum R. Optical molecular imaging for detection of Barrett’s-associated neoplasia. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(1): 53-62
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i1/53.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i1.53