©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2011; 17(1): 123-129
Published online Jan 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i1.123
Published online Jan 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i1.123
Table 2 Locations of lesions in patients undergoing percataneous and surgical radiofrequency ablation
| RFA | ||
| Percataneous (n = 89) | Surgical (n = 108) | |
| Segment location | ||
| I | 0 | 0 |
| II | 7 | 12 |
| III | 13 | 17 |
| IV | 9 | 12 |
| V | 10 | 14 |
| VI | 6 | 11 |
| VII | 12 | 20 |
| VIII | 12 | 7 |
| Adjacent vessels or organs | ||
| PH | 8 | 12 |
| RHV | 17 | 15 |
| MHV | 8 | 12 |
| LHV | 11 | 16 |
| IVC | 6 | 8 |
| Heart | 3 | 5 |
| Stomach | 9 | 17 |
| Lung | 15 | 2 |
| R.Kidney | 4 | 7 |
| Colon | 5 | 12 |
| GB | 3 | 2 |
-
Citation: Huang JW, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Croome KP, Yan LN, Wu H, Chen ZY, Prasoon P, Zeng Y. Surgical
vs percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma in dangerous locations. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(1): 123-129 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i1/123.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i1.123