Radical vs conservative surgery for hydatid liver cysts: Experience from single center

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 16, Issue 8

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

349

HTML

3541

Figures (1-2)

161

Tables (1-4)

147

Sum=4198

Feb 28, 2010 (publication date) through Apr 28, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Original Article

World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2010; 16(8): 953-959
Published online Feb 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i8.953

Table 4 Postoperative complications and management

Complications	Radical surgery	Conservative surgery	Management
Bilioma	0	1	Percutaneous drainage (other center)
Wound infection	0	3	Secondary healing therapy
Atelectasis	1	1	PEEP
Pneumonia	0	2	PEEP + antibiotherapy
Biliary leakage	2	3	3 cases: ERCP + sphincterotomy
			1 case: ERCP + sphincterotomy + internal biliary stent
			1 case: choledoc exploration + T-tube drainage

PEEP: Positive end-expiratory pressure.

Citation: Akbulut S, Senol A, Sezgin A, Cakabay B, Dursun M, Satici O. Radical vs conservative surgery for hydatid liver cysts: Experience from single center. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(8): 953-959
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i8/953.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i8.953