Radical vs conservative surgery for hydatid liver cysts: Experience from single center

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 16, Issue 8

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

349

HTML

3541

Figures (1-2)

161

Tables (1-4)

147

Sum=4198

Feb 28, 2010 (publication date) through Apr 28, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Original Article

World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2010; 16(8): 953-959
Published online Feb 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i8.953

Table 1 Comparison of both groups according to Gharbi classification

Type of cyst	Gharbi classification	Radical surgery	Conservative surgery	Total
Type I	Pure fluid collection	Excluded		0
Type II	Fluid collection with a split wall	2	7	9
Type III	Fluid collection with septal	5	14	19
Type IV	Heterogenous acho pattern	4	8	12
Type V	Reflecting thick walls	Excluded		0
Type III-IV		4	7	11
Type III-IV-V		3	5	8

Citation: Akbulut S, Senol A, Sezgin A, Cakabay B, Dursun M, Satici O. Radical vs conservative surgery for hydatid liver cysts: Experience from single center. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(8): 953-959
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i8/953.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i8.953