Prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating cap-assisted colonoscopy vs standard colonoscopy

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 16, Issue 31

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

371

HTML

2995

Figures (1-2)

119

Tables (1-5)

125

Sum=3610

Aug 21, 2010 (publication date) through Apr 18, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Original Article

World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2010; 16(31): 3905-3910
Published online Aug 21, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i31.3905

Table 5 Multivariate analysis of determinants of higher polyp detection rate

Independent predictors	OR	95% CI	P value
Age	1.450	1.213-1.734	< 0.001
Previous abdominal surgery	0.559	0.322-0.971	0.039
Having EGD on the same setting	0.451	0.266-0.765	0.003
Consultant	0.460	0.250-0.845	0.012
Use of hyoscine	2.877	1.374-6.026	0.005
Indication: polyp follow-up	2.722	1.342-5.523	0.006

EGD: Esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy.

Citation: Tee HP, Corte C, Al-Ghamdi H, Prakoso E, Darke J, Chettiar R, Rahman W, Davison S, Griffin SP, Selby WS, Kaffes AJ. Prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating cap-assisted colonoscopy vs standard colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(31): 3905-3910
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i31/3905.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i31.3905