Prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating cap-assisted colonoscopy vs standard colonoscopy

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 16, Issue 31

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

373

HTML

3005

Figures (1-2)

122

Tables (1-5)

126

Sum=3626

Aug 21, 2010 (publication date) through Apr 24, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Original Article

World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2010; 16(31): 3905-3910
Published online Aug 21, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i31.3905

Table 4 Secondary outcomes: polyp detection rate n (%)

	CAC	SC	P value
Subjects with polyps (n = 387)	63/192 (32.8)	61/195 (31.3)	0.75¹
Subjects aged ≥ 50 yr with polyps (n = 246)	51/118 (43.2)	46/128 (35.9)	0.24¹
Total number of polyps	147	107	0.59²
Total number of polyps with size ≤ 5 mm	121	84	0.45²
Total number of adenomas	75	55	0.26²
Total number of advanced adenomas	23	14	0.52²

¹χ² test;

²Mann-Whitney test. CAC: Cap-assisted colonoscopy; SC: Standard colonoscopy.

Citation: Tee HP, Corte C, Al-Ghamdi H, Prakoso E, Darke J, Chettiar R, Rahman W, Davison S, Griffin SP, Selby WS, Kaffes AJ. Prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating cap-assisted colonoscopy vs standard colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(31): 3905-3910
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i31/3905.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i31.3905