Comparison of two nutritional assessment methods in gastroenterology patients

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 16, Issue 16

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

332

HTML

2700

Tables (1-6)

141

Sum=3173

Apr 28, 2010 (publication date) through Apr 25, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2010; 16(16): 1999-2004
Published online Apr 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i16.1999

Table 6 Discriminant function analysis for particular groups of analyzed variables

Status	Centroids	Section points	Selecting equation	Percentage of accuracy
SGA
Well	-2.466	0.420	-2.58 + 0.04 × [albumins] - 0.038 × [proteins] + 2.83 × SGA score - 0.03 × body weight	100%
Malnourished	2.884	0.420		100%
NRI
Well	1.72	0.365	-11.75 + 0.17 × MAMC -0.20 × [glucose] + 1.04 × NRI score	93.7%
Malnourished	-0.99	0.365	-11.75 + 0.17 × MAMC -0.20 × [glucose] + 1.04 × NRI score	93.7%

Citation: Filipović BF, Gajić M, Milinić N, Milovanović B, Filipović BR, Cvetković M, Šibalić N. Comparison of two nutritional assessment methods in gastroenterology patients. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(16): 1999-2004
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i16/1999.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i16.1999