Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2010; 16(16): 1999-2004
Published online Apr 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i16.1999
Published online Apr 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i16.1999
Table 4 Differences in anthropometric measures and parameters of bioelectrical impedance analysis obtained by NRI (mean ± SD)
| Parameters | NRI assessment | Significance t test | |
| Well | Malnourished | ||
| n = 108 | n = 191 | ||
| MAC (cm) | 27.51 ± 2.73 | 25.11 ± 3.60 | F = 7.88, P = 0.005 |
| MAMC (cm) | 10.63 ± 12.42 | 9.68 ± 11.41 | F = 11.55, P = 0.001 |
| TSF (mm) | 9.09 ± 2.72 | 7.06 ± 3.20 | F = 11. 55, P = 0.007 |
| Waist circumferences (cm) | 88.51 ± 10.71 | 76.76 ± 13.81 | F = 7.14, P = 0.008 |
| Resistance of whole body (Ω) | 554.40 ± 91.07 | 623.37 ± 112.57 | F = 5.98, P =0.02 |
| Impedance-index | 54.36 ± 12.20 | 45.51 ± 12.03 | F = 6.82, P = 0.01 |
- Citation: Filipović BF, Gajić M, Milinić N, Milovanović B, Filipović BR, Cvetković M, Šibalić N. Comparison of two nutritional assessment methods in gastroenterology patients. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(16): 1999-2004
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i16/1999.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i16.1999