Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2009; 15(48): 6044-6051
Published online Dec 28, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.6044
Published online Dec 28, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.6044
Table 2 Diagnostic impact of imaging protocols on tumour detection n (%)
| Imaging protocols of MDCT and MRI | Tumour nodules detected |
| MRI, T1w 3D-Flash, arterial phase (20 s start delay) | 158 (97.5) |
| MRI, T1w 3D-Flash, portal-venous phase (45 s start delay) | 145 (89.5) |
| MRI, T1w 3D-Flash, equilibrium phase (90 s start delay) | 127 (78.4) |
| MDCT, arterial phase (bolus trigger for start delay) | 119 (73.5) |
| MRI, T1w 3D-Flash, delayed phase (300 s start delay) | 115 (71.0) |
| MRI, T1w 3D-Flash, dynamic phase Phase (T1 native) | 109 (67.3) |
| MRI, T1w 2D Flash native | 104 (64.2) |
| MRI, Dual-GRE in-phase | 98 (60.5) |
| MRI, Dual-GRE out-phase | 96 (59.3) |
| MDCT, portal-venous phase (55 s start delay) | 84 (51.9) |
| MRI, T2w TSE | 72 (44.4) |
| MDCT, native phase | 56 (34.6) |
-
Citation: Pitton MB, Kloeckner R, Herber S, Otto G, Kreitner KF, Dueber C. MRI
versus 64-row MDCT for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(48): 6044-6051 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i48/6044.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.6044