©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2009; 15(22): 2708-2713
Published online Jun 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2708
Published online Jun 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2708
Table 3 Comparison of treatment strategy and positive rate of cut margin n (%)
| Small (≤ 10 mm) | Large (> 10 mm) | P value | |
| Initial treatment | |||
| EMR | 62 (52) | 133 (29) | < 0.0001 |
| Surgery | 58 (48) | 330 (71) | |
| Positive rate of cut margin1 | 11 (18) | 26 (20) | 0.81 |
| In EMR cases | |||
| Lateral | 0 (0) | 8 (31) | 0.08 |
| Vertical | 11 (100) | 18 (69) |
- Citation: Matsuda T, Saito Y, Fujii T, Uraoka T, Nakajima T, Kobayashi N, Emura F, Ono A, Shimoda T, Ikematsu H, Fu KI, Sano Y, Fujimori T. Size does not determine the grade of malignancy of early invasive colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(22): 2708-2713
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i22/2708.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.2708