©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2009; 15(19): 2340-2344
Published online May 21, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2340
Published online May 21, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2340
Table 5 Subjective evaluation of the ease of handling and comfort of the abdominal drains
| Blake | Watterman | Latex | |
| Ease of emptying the collecting bag | |||
| Very easy | 7 | 7 | 9 |
| Easy | 3 | 4 | 2 |
| Difficult | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Very difficult | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Odor during the dressings | |||
| None | 9 | 1 | 5 |
| Bad | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Very bad | 0 | 7 | 3 |
| Pain at the drain site (pain scale) | |||
| 0 (no pain) | 6 | 5 | 2 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 5 (very intense pain) | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Pain during drain removal (pain scale) | |||
| 0 (no pain) | 7 | 4 | 3 |
| 1 | 2 | 6 | 2 |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 5 (very intense pain) | 0 | 0 | 2 |
- Citation: Salgado Júnior W, Macedo Neto MM, dos Santos JS, Sakarankutty AK, Ceneviva R, de Castro e Silva Jr O. Study of the patency of different peritoneal drains used prophylactically in bariatric surgery. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(19): 2340-2344
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i19/2340.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.2340