Study of the patency of different peritoneal drains used prophylactically in bariatric surgery

doi:10.3748/wjg.15.2340

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 15, Issue 19

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (2337)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-1) series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

251

HTML

1710

Figures (1-1)

193

Tables (1-5)

183

Sum=2337

May 21, 2009 (publication date) through May 20, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (2)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Articles

World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2009; 15(19): 2340-2344
Published online May 21, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2340

Table 4 Microbiology of the fluid drained from the peritoneal cavity and from a part of the intraperitoneal segment of the drain

	Group 1-Latex	Group 2-Watterman	Group 3-Blake
Patient 1	Pseudomonas aeruginosa	Enterobacter cloacae¹	Staphylococcus aureus
	Pseudomonas aeruginosa	Escherichia coli¹	Staphylococcus aureus
Patient 2	Enterobacter aerogenes	Proteus mirabilis	Proteus mirabilis
	Enterobacter aerogenes	Proteus mirabilis	Pseudomonas aeruginosa + Morganella morgani
Patient 3	Klebsiella pneumoniae + Staphylococcus simulans	Serratia marcescens	Staphylococcus aureus + Proteus mirabilis + Enterobacter cloacae
	Staphylococcus aureus + Klebsiella pneumoniae + Morganella morgani + Proteus mirabilis	Serratia marcescens	Serratia marcescens + Enterococcus faecalis
Patient 4	Serratia marcescens	Pseudomonas aeruginosa	Proteus mirabilis + Klebsiella pneumoniae + Enterococcus faecalis
	Serratia marcescens	Pseudomonas aeruginosa	Staphylococcus aureus + Proteus mirabilis
Patient 5	Escherichia coli + Proteus mirabilis	Enterobacter cloacae	Proteus mirabilis
	Pseudomonas aeruginosa	Klebsiella pneumoniae	Proteus mirabilis
Patient 6	Citrobacter koseri	Proteus vulgaris	Klebsiella pneumoniae + Proteus mirabilis
	Proteus mirabilis + Citrobacter koseri	Proteus vulgaris	Klebsiella pneumoniae + Proteus mirabilis
Patient 7	Staphylococcus aureus + Proteus mirabilis	Pseudomonas aeruginosa + Klebsiella pneumoniae	-
	Staphylococcus aureus + Proteus mirabilis	Pseudomonas aeruginosa	-
Patient 8	Proteus mirabilis	Enterococcus faecalis + Staphylococcus aureus	-
	Proteus mirabilis + Serratia marcescens	Enterococcus faecalis + Staphylococcus aureus	-
Patient 9	Enterobacter cloacae	Escherichia coli	Staphylococcus epidermidis
	Enterobacter cloacae	Escherichia coli	Staphylococcus aureus
Patient 10	Escherichia coli + Enterococcus faecalis	Enterococcus faecalis	Staphylococcus simulans
	Morganella morganii	Enterococcus faecalis	Klebsiella pneumoniae
Patient 11	Enterobacter cloacae	Proteus mirabilis + Kebsiella pneumoniae	Staphylococcus epidermidis
	Enterobacter cloacae	Proteus mirabilis	Staphylococcus epidermidis

¹Patient with a methylene blue test that was positive for dehiscence.

Citation: Salgado Júnior W, Macedo Neto MM, dos Santos JS, Sakarankutty AK, Ceneviva R, de Castro e Silva Jr O. Study of the patency of different peritoneal drains used prophylactically in bariatric surgery. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(19): 2340-2344
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i19/2340.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.2340