Editorial
Copyright ©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2008; 14(9): 1313-1317
Published online Mar 7, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.1313
Table 2 List of 7 case-control studies, comparing transit times and proportions of cecum demonstration, fulfilling the inclusion/exclusion criteria (n = 401)
AuthorRef.Prep.No. withNo. withoutGTT with (min)GTT without (min)SBTT with (min)SBTT without (min)Cecum reached withCecum reached without
Niv Y, 200410Na-P221025.018.0300333165
Viazis N, 2004217PEG 2L404036.244.1291.8304.63226
Niv Y, 200511Na-P232325.040.03412411818
Ben-Soussan E, 200513PEG 2L261645.725.52882712416
Fireman Z, 200514PEG 1L or Na-Por Erythro55140139.745.5228218NMNM
Dai N, 200516PEG 4L332813.014.02132533222
Caddy GR, 200615Erythro222350.538.4304.4302.675
Total16614012992
Average ± SD33.5 ± 13.232.2 ± 12.8280.8 ± 44.9274.7 ± 40.6
Proportion0.760.68
P0.2960.1550.38