©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2008; 14(25): 4011-4019
Published online Jul 7, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.4011
Published online Jul 7, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.4011
Table 2 Accuracy of EUS with confidence intervals to diagnose T and N stages in gastric cancer patients
| Pooled sensitivity | Pooled specificity | Pooled LR+ | Pooled LR- | Pooled DOR | |
| T1 | 88.1% (84.5-91.1) | 100.0% (99.7-100.0) | 90.1 (48.9-165.7) | 0.17 (0.10-0.28) | 605.6 (296.8-1235.6) |
| T2 | 82.3% (78.2-86.0) | 95.6% (94.4-96.6) | 17.3 (10.9-27.5) | 0.23 (0.17-0.290 | 108.6 (56.6-208.1) |
| T3 | 89.7% (87.1-92.0) | 94.7% (93.3-95.9) | 14.3 (10.3-19.8) | 0.13 (0.08-0.19) | 144.4 (95.4-218.7) |
| T4 | 99.2% (97.1-99.9) | 96.7% (95.7-97.6) | 19.6 (14.1-27.2) | 0.07 (0.04-0.12) | 507.8 (247.5-1042.1) |
| N1 | 58.2% (53.5-62.8) | 87.2% (84.4-89.7) | 4.1 (2.4-7.1) | 0.49 (0.41-0.58) | 9.5 (5.3-16.9) |
| N2 | 64.9% (60.8-68.8) | 92.4% (89.9-94.4) | 6.7 (4.1-10.9) | 0.39 (0.31-0.49) | 26.6 (13.9-50.7) |
- Citation: Puli SR, Reddy JBK, Bechtold ML, Antillon MR, Ibdah JA. How good is endoscopic ultrasound for TNM staging of gastric cancers? A meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(25): 4011-4019
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v14/i25/4011.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.4011