Copyright
©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2006; 12(26): 4170-4174
Published online Jul 14, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4170
Published online Jul 14, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4170
Table 2 Sites and rates of residual stone
| Groups | n | Site of stone residual | Rate | ||||
| Leftliver | Rightliver | CBD | Leftliver | Rightliver | Total (%) | ||
| HJ group | 123 | 8 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 20.3a |
| +hepatectomy (A1) | 76 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 18.4 |
| +CBD exploration (A2) | 47 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 23.4 |
| T tube drainage group | 191 | 17 | 22 | 3 | 12 | 54 | 28.3 |
| + hepatectomy (B1) | 85 | 5 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 21.2 |
| + CBD exploration (B2) | 106 | 12 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 36 | 34.0 |
- Citation: Li SQ, Liang LJ, Peng BG, Lai JM, Lu MD, Li DM. Hepaticojejunostomy for hepatolithiasis: A critical appraisal. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(26): 4170-4174
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i26/4170.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4170