©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2006; 12(19): 3108-3113
Published online May 21, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i19.3108
Published online May 21, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i19.3108
Table 2 Clinical outcomes of endoscopic injection therapy
| Epinephrine(20 mL) n (%) | Epinephrine(30 mL) n (%) | Epinephrine(40 mL) n (%) | |
| Initial hemostasis | 74 (97.4) | 75 (98.7) | 76 (100) |
| Recurrent bleeding | 15/74 (20.3)b | 4/75 (5.3) | 2/72 (2.8) |
| Perforated peptic ulcer | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 4 (5.3)a |
| Surgical intervention | 4 (5.3) | 2 (2.6) | 5 (6.6) |
| Transfusion requirement (units) | 4.7 ± 3.4 | 4.5 ± 3.2 | 4.2 ± 3.6 |
| Total hospital stay (days) | 10.8 ± 3.3 | 9.7 ± 3.5 | 10.2 ± 3.1 |
| Deaths from bleeding | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 30-d mortality | 3 (3.9) | 2 (2.6) | 4 (5.3) |
| No. of patients that felt pain' | 2 (2.6) | 5 (6.6) | 51 (67.1)d |
- Citation: Liou TC, Lin SC, Wang HY, Chang WH. Optimal injection volume of epinephrine for endoscopic treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(19): 3108-3113
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i19/3108.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i19.3108