Copyright
©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2005; 11(47): 7486-7493
Published online Dec 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i47.7486
Published online Dec 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i47.7486
Table 8 Hemodynamic profile
| Baseline | Day of colonoscopy change1 from baseline | Follow-up visit change1 from baseline | ||||
| NaP | PEG | NaP | PEG | NaP | PEG | |
| Pulse (beats/min) mean±SD2 | 76.4±11.2 | 72.9±12.4 | 5.4±13.6 | 6.7±12.6 | 1.7±10.9 | 0.6±13.0 |
| Elevation in pulse rate ±10 beats/min (n %) | 13 (32.5%) | 13 (32.5%) | 8 (20%) | 9 (22.5%) | ||
| Elevation in pulse rate ±20 beats/min (n %) | 5 (12.5%) | 4 (10%) | 3 (7.5%) | 3 (7.5%) | ||
| SBP3 (mmHg) mean±SD2 | 128.0±16.4 | 130.4±16.0 | -6.8±12.5 | -1.7±10.8 | -4.3±10.7 | -1.4±13.6 |
| Drop in SBP ≥10 mmHg (n %) | 13 (32.5%) | 11 (27.5%) | 14 (35%) | 7 (17.5%) | ||
| Drop in SBP ≥20 mmHg (n %) | 3 (7.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (5%) | 4 (10%) | ||
- Citation: Hwang KL, Chen WTL, Hsiao KH, Chen HC, Huang TM, Chiu CM, Hsu GH. Prospective randomized comparison of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol lavage for colonoscopy preparation. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(47): 7486-7493
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i47/7486.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i47.7486