©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2005; 11(12): 1779-1784
Published online Mar 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i12.1779
Published online Mar 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i12.1779
Table 6 Cox’s proportional hazards analysis.
| Factors | Relative risk (95% confidence interval) | P |
| Mucobilia (without mucobilia/mucobilia ) | 2.185 (1.324–3.605) | 0.002 |
| Tumor spreading type (non-papillary/papillary) | 1.455 (1.028–2.060) | <0.001 |
| Type of operation (non-hepatectomy/hepatectomy) | 1.946 (1.477–2.564) | <0.001 |
| Tumor staging | ||
| (II/I) | 1.637 (0.786–3.406) | 0.188 |
| (III/I) | 3.334 (1.615–6.882) | 0.001 |
| (IV/I) | 4.049 (1.940–8.449) | <0.001 |
| Post-operative chemotherapy (no chemotherapy/chemotherapy) | 1.823 (1.413–2.353) | <0.001 |
- Citation: Jan YY, Yeh CN, Yeh TS, Chen TC. Prognostic analysis of surgical treatment of peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: Two decades of experience at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(12): 1779-1784
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i12/1779.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i12.1779