Copyright
©The Author(s) 2004.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 1, 2004; 10(23): 3495-3499
Published online Dec 1, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i23.3495
Published online Dec 1, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i23.3495
Table 4 Common bile duct stones in cases of different posi-tive prognostic factors (PPF)
| Factor | Number | Stone | Negative | Unsuccessful | % |
| Hyperbilirubinaemia ( > 2) | 61 | 44 | 16 | 1 | 72 |
| Elevated ASAT/ALAT ( > 50%) | 116 | 74 | 39 | 3 | 64 |
| Elevated GGT/ALP ( > 50%) | 134 | 79 | 52 | 3 | 59 |
| Acute pancreatitis (AP) | 26 | 18 | 7 | 1 | 69 |
| AP in the anamnesis | 20 | 4 | 16 | 0 | 20 |
| Jaundice in the anamnesis | 29 | 1 | 26 | 2 | 3 |
| US: CBD ≥ 8 mm | 53 | 38 | 14 | 1 | 71 |
| US: bile duct stone | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57 |
| Biliary colic | 106 | 62 | 42 | 2 | 58 |
- Citation: Lakatos L, Mester G, Reti G, Nagy A, Lakatos PL. Selection criteria for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones: Results of a retrospective, single center study between 1996-2002. World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10(23): 3495-3499
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v10/i23/3495.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v10.i23.3495